Observations on Fiber-Forming Collagens in the Anulus Fibrosus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: The spatial distribution of fiber-forming collagens in the anulus fibrosus was investigated in the complete longitudinal and horizontal sections of human lumbar intervertebral discs of seven individuals. OBJECTIVES: To obtain a more detailed structural definition of the anulus fibrosus because structural alterations of its collagen fiber network have been implicated in discal degeneration and other spinal pathologies. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prior biochemical or immunofluorescence studies permitted only limited conclusions concerning the spatial distribution of the fiber-forming collagens in relation to anatomic structures because they were based on intraoperative tissue specimens or performed on incomplete sections of human intervertebral discs. METHODS: Complete human intervertebral discs with their adjacent vertebral bodies were fixed, decalcified, and embedded in paraffin. The intervertebral disc and its adjacent structures were reviewed in their entirety on one histologic slide. Monoclonal antibodies against human Types I, II, and III collagen were used for immunohistochemistry. A comparative analysis based on both immunohistochemical and histologic evaluation was performed. RESULTS: Type I collagen was seen abundantly in the outer zone and outer lamellas of the inner zone of the anulus fibrosus. On longitudinal sections, the Type I collagen distribution took the shape of a wedge. On horizontal sections, the Type I collagen positive area took the shape of a ring that was wider anteriorly than posteriorly. This suggests that the three-dimensional shape of the Type I collagen-positive tissue in the anulus fibrosus can be described by a donut that is wider anteriorly than posteriorly. Type II collagen was present in the entire inner of the anulus fibrosus, but not in the outer zone. In addition, it was found in the cartilaginous endplates. Type III collagen showed some codistribution with Type II collagen, particularly in pericellular locations in areas of spondylosis, which was noted at the endplates, vertebral rim, and insertion sites of the anulus fibrosus. CONCLUSIONS: These observations on the location of Types I and II collagen provide a more detailed structural definition of the anulus fibrosus, which may assist in further investigation of discal herniation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".