MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003136270 · doi:10.1086/379309

Spontaneous Generation of the Magnetic Field and Suppression of the Heat Conduction in Cold Fronts

2003· article· en· W2003136270 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N. Okabe, M. Hattori

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMagnetic fieldInstabilityThermal conductionElectronCondensed matter physicsPlasmaSaturation (graph theory)AnisotropyMechanicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have determined the physical mechanism responsible for plasma instabilities, which were first found by Ramani & Laval in 1978, associated with anisotropic velocity distributions induced by a temperature gradient in which there are growing low-frequency transverse magnetic waves, even in the absence of background magnetic fields. We have shown that the physical mechanism responsible for the growth of one of the modes is identical to the Weibel instability. The nonlinear saturation level of the instability is also provided by considering the wave-particle interactions. The nonlinear evolution of the magnetic fields after the saturation is speculated on. The results are applied to the cold fronts newly discovered by the Chandra X-Ray Observatory in clusters of galaxies. We predict the existence of a magnetic field of ~10 μG tangential to the surface over the entire region of the cold front and that the heat conduction is significantly suppressed by the trapping of electrons by the generated magnetic fields. The instability may provide a new possibility for the origin of the cosmic magnetic field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207