MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Primary vascular pattern and expression of <i>ATHB‐8</i> in shoots of <i>Arabidopsis</i>

2003· article· en· W2003158742 on OpenAlexafffund
Julie Kang, John Tang, Petra M. Donnelly, Nancy G. Dengler

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Phytologist · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyVascular tissuePrimordiumArabidopsis thalianaXylemBotanyPhyllotaxisReticulateShootVascular bundleHomeoboxVascular plantArabidopsisGene expressionCell biologyEvolutionary biologyGeneMeristemGeneticsMutantEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Primary vascular pattern determines pathways of long distance transport for water, nutrients and signalling molecules within plant shoot systems. • Expression of an Arabidopsis thaliana homeobox gene 8::GUS construct is restricted to the procambium and provides a molecular marker for vascular pattern at early developmental stages. • Primary vascular pattern and phyllotaxis are highly coordinated, with vascular sympodia corresponding to phyllotactic parastichies. During vegetative development, primary vasculature forms a reticulate pattern, with each leaf trace derived from two vascular sympodia. Shoot phase change is marked by alterations of this fundamental pattern. Formation of leaf trace procambial strands is temporally coordinated with primordium initiation, but ATHB-8::GUS expression is discontinuous in these strands at early stages. • The interconnection of vascular sympodia provides alternate pathways for long distance transport in shoots of A. thaliana and reflects the limited secondary growth in this species. ATHB-8::GUS expression identifies a prepattern that precedes anatomical definition of procambium. The longitudinal discontinuity in ATHB-8::GUS expression indicates that one function of this gene is to define the xylem components of vascular radial pattern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew PhytologistSame topicPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207