MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003164705 · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.118.6.1365

Corticosterone Increases Depression-Like Behavior, With Some Effects on Predator Odor-Induced Defensive Behavior, in Male and Female Rats.

2004· article· en· W2003164705 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBehavioral Neuroscience · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorticosteroneOpen fieldOdorBehavioural despair testPsychologyAnxietyElevated plus mazeAdult maleInternal medicineDepression (economics)EndocrinologyPredatorMedicineBiologyPsychiatryNeuroscienceAntidepressantHormoneEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This experiment examined the effect of repeated corticosterone injections on anxiety and depression-like behavior in male and female rats. Rats received either corticosterone or vehicle injections for 21 consecutive days prior to behavioral testing in the forced swim, open-field, and predator odor tests. The corticosterone injections significantly increased depression-like behavior in the forced swim test in both male and female rats but had no significant effect on anxiety in the open-field test. In the predator odor test, the corticosterone injections significantly increased a subset of defensive behaviors in the male rats. These results suggest that repeated exposure to corticosterone increases depression-like behavior, with some effects on anxiety, and that male rats may be more affected than female rats by this manipulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.369
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it