MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003168169 · doi:10.1002/pse.79

Modern structural wood products

2001· article· en· W2003168169 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in Structural Engineering and Materials · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWood Treatment and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaminated veneer lumberOriented strand boardEngineered woodEngineeringVeneerManufacturing processManufacturing engineeringComposite materialMaterials scienceStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A Correction has been published for this article in Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 3(4) 2001, 361. Engineered wood products are structural composites that have been gaining successes in the construction industry. The mechanical and physical properties of these products depend on the interacting relationships between the quality of the resource, the manufacturing process, and the applications. In general their mechanical properties are more uniform compared with solid sawn material; hence, higher allowable properties are available in engineering design. This paper reviews the manufacturing processes, structural properties, physical attributes, and common applications of some of the major engineered wood products including: glued‐laminated timber, parallel strand lumber, laminated strand lumber, laminated veneer lumber, and thick oriented strand board/rimboard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.432
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it