MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003171687 · doi:10.1117/12.2036778

Stabilization methods for small molecule dewetting on indium tin oxide substrates for organic photovoltaics

2013· article· en· W2003171687 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Heidkamp, Felix Maye, Ayse Turak

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceOrganic solar cellIndium tin oxideHeterojunctionHybrid solar cellOptoelectronicsSolar cellPEDOT:PSSOrganic semiconductorDewettingNanotechnologyPolymer solar cellThin filmLayer (electronics)PolymerComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heterojunctions are inherent in and essential to all molecular electronic devices. In organic solar cells, in particular, heterojunctions play a defining role in all of the major electrical processes and particularly in stability. The p-type organic molecule diindenoperylene (DIP) is an interesting photoactive organic molecule that forms inherently unstable interfaces within organic solar cell devices. Using scanning probe microscopies, supported by x-ray scattering, we examined the stability of inorganic/organic interfaces at both charge extraction electrodes. The DIP morphology can be stabilized by: 1. roughening the ITO surface, which disrupts the molecular packing, 2. using an interlayer such as PEDOT:PSS, which modifies the surface energy, or 3. depositing a dielectric layer, LiF, which pins the DIP grain boundaries. Any combination of the approaches would lead to significant improvements in solar cell lifetime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207