Kinin B<sub>1</sub> and B<sub>2</sub> receptor mRNA expression in the hypothalamus of spontaneously hypertensive rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The central hypertensive effects induced by bradykinin are known to be mediated via B2 receptors, which are present constitutively in the brain. B, receptors are rapidly upregulated during inflammation, hyperalgesia, and experimental diabetes. The hypothalamus plays an important role in the regulation of cardiovascular homeostasis, and all components of kallikrein-kinin system have been identified in this area. Therefore, we analyzed the mRNA expression of B1 and B2 receptors in the hypothalamus of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) by RT-PCR. Male SHR were studied at three different ages corresponding to the three phases in the development of hypertension: (i) 3-4 (prehypertensive), (ii) 7-8 (onset of hypertension), and (iii) 12-13 weeks (established hypertension) after birth, and compared with age-matched Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats. At all ages tested, B2 receptor mRNA levels in the hypothalamus of SHR were higher than age-matched WKY rats (p < 0.001). However, the B1 receptor mRNA levels were higher at the established phase of hypertension only. We conclude that B1 and B2 receptor mRNA are differentially expressed in the hypothalamus of SHR and may play different roles in the pathogenesis of hypertension: upregulation of B2 receptor mRNA from early age may participate in the pathogenesis of hypertension, whereas an upregulation of B1 receptor mRNA in the established phase of hypertension may reflect an epiphenomenon in essential hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".