MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003218494 · doi:10.1142/s0219498811004616

ON SEMITRANSITIVE JORDAN ALGEBRAS OF MATRICES

2011· article· en· W2003218494 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Algebra and Its Applications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsJordan algebraPure mathematicsAlgebraically closed fieldVector spaceTriangular matrixDivision algebraAlgebra representationNilpotent matrixAlgebra over a fieldField (mathematics)Universal enveloping algebraJordan matrixInvertible matrixEigenvalues and eigenvectorsSquare matrixSymmetric matrix

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A set [Formula: see text] of linear operators on a vector space is said to be semitransitive if, given nonzero vectors x, y, there exists [Formula: see text] such that either Ax = y or Ay = x. In this paper we consider semitransitive Jordan algebras of operators on a finite-dimensional vector space over an algebraically closed field of characteristic not two. Two of our main results are: (1) Every irreducible semitransitive Jordan algebra is actually transitive. (2) Every semitransitive Jordan algebra contains, up to simultaneous similarity, the upper triangular Toeplitz algebra, i.e. the unital (associative) algebra generated by a nilpotent operator of maximal index.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it