Raman study of optical phonons in ultrathin<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">In</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">As</mml:mi><mml:mo>∕</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">In</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>single strained quantum wells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By means of Raman scattering, photoluminescence, and x-ray diffraction experiments, we have studied a series of ultrathin $\mathrm{In}\mathrm{As}∕\mathrm{In}\mathrm{P}$ single quantum wells grown with nominal well thickness varying between one and four monolayers. The observed Raman peaks are attributed to the first InAs-confined longitudinal optical phonon. When the quantum well is thinner than three monolayers, the measured frequencies of the confined modes depart from the predictions of the standard confined-phonon model but are in good agreement with the results of ab initio calculations based on density-functional theory. This indicates that there is a significant penetration of the InAs layer vibrations in the InP barriers and that thickness fluctuations occur at a scale short enough to further shift the phonon frequencies. When the wells contain more than three monolayers, a doublet Raman structure is observed which parallels the evolution of the photoluminescence spectra from single- to multiple-peak emission. We associate this simultaneous change in Raman and photoluminescence spectra with the two- to three-dimensional growth-mode transition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.082 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".