MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003252670 · doi:10.1364/oe.11.003242

Optical system having a large focal depth for distant object tracking

2003· article· en· W2003252670 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced optical system design
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsCardinal pointFocal lengthPhysicsPhase (matter)Lens (geology)Quartic functionFocus (optics)Depth of fieldMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze an optical system after inserting a simple quartic phase plate in its pupil plane to extend the focal depth. The system is used specifically to track distant objects like stars. We design an optimum quartic phase plate for a real lens system which has an effective focal length of 29 mm, an F-number of 1.6, a field of view of 20 degrees, and a working wavelength range of 0.5~0.75 ?m. By introducing the quartic phase plate, we enhance the focal depth of the system more than threefold as compared to a system having no phase plate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it