Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'intérêt de la théorie récente pour le rythme peut répondre à la perte du « réel » dans le constructionnisme radical postmoderne. Mais Kristeva et Meschonnic, en redéfinissant le rythme en le liant à la subjectivité et au discours, répètent la perte du corps et la perte moderne de la spécificité de la poésie par rapport à la prose. En retenant le sens traditionnel, musical, du « rythme », nous retrouvons le rythme dans la poésie comme dans la politique. Le rythme est cet élément du langage sans signifiance. Il crée une communauté en effaçant le sens institué, la subjectivité individuelle, les hiérarchies et les préjugés. Une lecture d'un poème de Wallace Stevens montre que la poésie « fait un pont » (pontifex) entre le sens et le rythme, si on la lit comme une allégorie du pouvoir extatique du rythme, donc de l'effort vain du langage à représenter sa source rythmique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".