MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2003281758 · doi:10.1063/1.1376429

Microcavity-enhanced surface-emitted second-harmonic generation from 200 fs pulses at 1.5 μm

2001· article· en· W2003281758 on OpenAlexaff
Todd G. Ulmer, Marc Hanna, Brian R. Washburn, C. M. Verber, Stephen E. Ralph, A. J. SpringThorpe

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCladding (metalworking)Second-harmonic generationOpticsMaterials scienceFemtosecondOptoelectronicsResonance (particle physics)Harmonic spectrumHarmonicOptical microcavityWaveguideHigh harmonic generationSurface second harmonic generationLaserPhysicsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present theoretical results for short-pulse surface-emitted second-harmonic generation and show that significant cavity enhancement is possible in the femtosecond regime. Experimentally, we demonstrate enhanced surface-emitted second-harmonic generation using 200 fs fundamental pulses near 1.5 μm by use of a 5λSH/2n vertical microcavity in [211]-oriented AlGaAs waveguides. The microcavity height is minimized by allowing the distributed Bragg reflectors that define the vertical cavity to also serve as cladding layers for the fundamental waveguide, thereby increasing the resonance width and hence the overlap with the second-harmonic spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics Letters→Same topicPhotonic and Optical Devices→French-language works237,207→