Toward understanding the development of scleral ossicles in the chicken, <i>Gallus gallus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scleral ossicles are dermal bones that are present in the eye of many vertebrates. Despite this, little is understood about their development. This study investigates the cellular dynamics during and after induction, and attempts to identify inducing factors. Both cell death and proliferation were found to play limited roles in mesenchymal condensation formation, but are involved in development of the inducing epithelium overlying the presumptive ossicle. Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of candidate genes identified significant increases in sonic hedgehog (SHH) expression. In situ hybridization confirmed that SHH is exclusively expressed in the conjunctival (scleral) papillae and not in the mesenchyme. Direct localized inhibition of Hedgehog signaling, by means of cyclopamine, supports the finding that SHH may play a role in scleral ossicle induction. In addition, a nonfluctuating asymmetry with respect to the number of ossicles per eye was found. This study provides significant insight into understanding the development of the neural crest derived dermal bones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".