MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Electromagnetic imaging inside metallic enclosures using the normal boundary field components

2014· article· en· W2003296107 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromagnetic shieldingAcousticsElectromagnetic fieldElectromagnetic reverberation chamberTransverse planePhysicsBoundary value problemMicrowave imagingOpticsElectrical conductorNoise (video)Computer scienceMaterials scienceMicrowaveEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. In recent years, electromagnetic imaging inside chambers with metallic walls has been investigated both theoretically and experimentally. Potential advantages in utilizing these chambers include: (i) shielding the inside of the imaging chamber from outside noise, (ii) better signal-to-noise ratio that may improve the resolution of the imaging modality, (iii) easier system modeling in comparison to open-boundary problems, (iv) the ability to use a lossless matching medium which means more energy is delivered to the target.First, an overview of the research conducted in the area of electromagnetic imaging inside metallic enclosures at the University of Manitoba is presented. This includes two-dimensional transverse magnetic (TM) and transverse electric (TE) microwave tomography (MWT) inside metallic chambers with different boundary shapes (A. Zakaria et al., IEEE TAP, 59, 2012); MWT inside rotating conductive chambers (P. Mojabi and J. LoVetri, IEEE TAP, 59, 2011); MWT using different metallic enclosures simultaneously; and methods and algorithms used to ease studying and performing electromagnetic imaging inside metallic enclosures (A. Zakaria et al., Inverse Problems, 26, 2010). Next, a novel approach for electromagnetic imaging in metallic enclosures is introduced and investigated. The new method utilizes normal field component measurements near the metallic chamber walls to perform imaging; near the chamber boundary the normal electric field components are dominant while the the tangential components vanish. The study is performed both synthetically and experimentally. Using an in-house parallelized full-vectorial electromagnetic finite-element solver, various chamber configurations are modeled and used to collect synthetic datasets (A. Zakaria et al., PIER, 147, 2013). The data are inverted using the finite-element contrast source inversion (FEMCSI) method. The goal of the synthetic study is to understand the effects of frequency-selection, number of observation points, and transceiver modeling on the imaging results. Experimentally, normal electric field data are collected from two configurations. The first setup consists of an air-filled circular metallic chamber with an open-top; within the chamber 24 antennas distributed in three layers are used to measure the normal electric field component near the chamber walls. In the second experiment, electromagnetic imaging inside a grain-bin storage facility is performed. The bin is an enclosed metallic chamber of 4.7 m radius and 7.5 m height. The data are collected using 12 monopole antennas normal to the bin walls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207