Challenges and Solutions for Sustainable Land Use in Ruoergai-the Highest Altitude Peatland in Qinhai-Tibetan Plateau, China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Ruoergai peatlands play an important role in regulating the hydrology of vast upland rangelands and downstream regions - the Yellow River watershed, maintaining the biodiversity and providing living space for Tibetan pastoralists. With various channels of funds, substantial measures were taken to stop or reverse the degradations. However, the degradations associated with over-grazing and other improper resources utilization remain unsolved. The satellite images in 1977 and 2007 were analyzed with the aid of field survey through peat coring to assess the dominant degradations and seek further solutions for the sustainable land management in this area. Results show that 77% of peatlands were degraded by overgrazing and artificial drainage change for more cultivation land. Approximately, 1,568 ha of the degraded peatlands have been successfully restored by damming approach. The ecosystem functions such as their resilience to climate change and adaptive capacity to the local and downstream communities may be restored through damming approach with very little expense.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".