Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is the most frequent and the most important idiosyncratic haematological drug reaction. It is important for several reasons: first, because heparin is used so often, and the frequency of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is high, the risk of a hospitalized patient developing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is high. Second, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia poses a major therapeutic dilemma for the clinician - continue the heparin and risk a worsening of the thrombocytopenia, or stop the heparin and risk extension or embolism of the thrombus. Finally, a small subset of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia develop the disastrous complication of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia plus arterial thrombosis. Some of these patients die. In this review, we will summarize some of the issues concerning heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, including its frequency, the various techniques used to diagnose the condition, its pathophysiology and approaches that can be used to manage patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".