Assisted conception. II—In vitro fertilisation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are two of the main types of assisted conception that take place in the laboratory. This article covers these two techniques in detail and looks at their safety and success. Fertilisation: (left) each egg is surrounded by a complex of cumulus cells (purple) that the sperm need to disperse to reach the zona pellucida, the protective outer coating of the egg; (middle) capacitated sperm first bind to the zona pellucida (1) and release enzymes from the acrosome (2), which digest a pathway through the zona pellucida (3); (right) the sperm is able to fuse with the plasma membrane of the egg and becomes incorporated within the egg In IVF, oocytes (obtained surgically from ovarian follicles in superovulated cycles) and prepared sperm are brought together in a dish in the laboratory. Fertilisation takes place outside the body (in vitro = in glass). Cleavage stage embryos derived from these fertilised oocytes are placed in the uterus (embryo transfer) for pregnancy to occur. View this table: Indications for IVF ### The process #### Superovulation Patients receive superovulation treatment with gonadotrophins, usually preceded by pituitary suppression with gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues (see last week's article). A careful balance is needed to maximise safely the number of oocytes retrieved. Ideally, there should be a choice of embryos for transfer, and some embryos should be available for cryopreservation. However, the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome also needs to be minimised. Ultrasonography of the ovaries and in some cases monitoring the rise in plasma estradiol concentration are used to check the effect of superovulation. Administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin is scheduled when the leading follicles are≥18 mm in diameter, and given 34-38 hours before planned egg retrieval. About 10% of cycles are cancelled before the planned egg collection because the response to superovulation is excessive and …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".