MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003433620 · doi:10.1002/ange.201410376

Natriumionenbatterien für die elektrochemische Energiespeicherung

2015· article· de· W2003433620 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie · 2015
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesChemistryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fortschrittliche Energiespeichertechnologien sind von immenser Bedeutung für tragbare elektronische Geräte, Elektrofahrzeuge, die Stromspeicherung in Kraftwerken und den Lastausgleich von Stromnetzen auf der Basis erneuerbarer Energien wie Solarenergie und Windkraft. Für die ersten zwei dieser Anwendungen haben sich Lithiumionenbatterien erfolgreich bewährt. Für die zwei letzteren Fälle scheint es jedoch sinnvoll, einen Schritt weiterzugehen – hin zum nächsten Alkalimetall im Periodensystem, dem Natrium. Eine flächendeckende Einführung von Natriumionenbatterien erfordert deren intensive Erforschung, einschließlich der Entdeckung neuer Materialien und ihrer Elektrochemie. Dieser Aufsatz fasst den aktuellen Stand der Forschung auf dem Gebiet der Natriumionenbatterien zusammen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it