Le Québec et le Canada comme collectivités neuves. Esquisse d'étude comparée
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'auteur présente une démarche d'analyse originale pour l'étude des sociétés du Nouveau Monde (incluant l'Australasie et l'Afrique du Sud). Essentiellement comparative, cette problématique des collectivités neuves (ou cultures fondatrices) s'articule à quelques interrogations fondamentales relatives à la formation de ces cultures et à l'institution de leur rapport aux nouveaux espaces-continuité et rupture à l'égard des métropoles européennes, élaboration de représentations et de finalités collectives (ex. formulation d'utopies), essor de l'idée nationale, construction de la mémoire, recherche d'une identité, appropriation symbolique du territoire dans la culture savante et dans la culture populaire, etc. La confrontation des divers itinéraires parcourus par ces collectivités peut aider à mieux comprendre les spécificités de chacune en même temps que certains processus généraux qui commandent la formation et l'évolution des imaginaires collectifs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".