MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003459984 · doi:10.1039/b400315b

Determination of total mercury in whole blood by flow injection cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry with room temperature digestion using tetramethylammonium hydroxide

2004· article· en· W2003459984 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fernando Barbosa, Christopher D. Palmer, Francisco José Krug, Patrick J. Parsons

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCenters for Disease Control and PreventionRMIT University
KeywordsTetramethylammonium hydroxideRepeatabilityDetection limitAtomic absorption spectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryMicrowave digestionCertified reference materialsChromatographyStandard additionMass spectrometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An improved method is described for the determination of total Hg in whole blood based on flow injection cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry (FI-CVAAS). Aliquots of whole blood (300 µl) are diluted 1 + 1 v/v with 10% v/v tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) solution, incubated for 1 h at room temperature and then further diluted 1 + 4 v/v with 2% v/v HCl. The TMAH approach is directly compared to a previously published method that utilizes an on-line microwave-assisted heating step as part of the FI arrangement. Thus, the key issue addressed here is the elimination of the on-line microwave digestion step from the FI manifold, because of problems observed with precipitation in the reaction coil and high back pressure in FI manifold. Matrix-matched calibration standards are used and the method detection limit (3σ) is 0.2 µg l−1. Method accuracy is traceable to Standard Reference Material (SRM) 966 Toxic Metals in Bovine Blood from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Additional validation data are provided based on the analysis of whole blood materials from the New York State Department of Health's Proficiency Testing Program for Trace Elements and from the trace elements intercomparison program operated by the Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Canada. Accuracy (−2.5%) and precision (<6.0% repeatability and <10% intermediate precision) of the TMAH method compare favorably with values obtained for the on-line microwave method (<10.0% repeatability and <15% reproducibility), and the TMAH method is essentially free of the disadvantages associated with the latter method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical Atomic SpectrometrySame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207