La fortune littéraire du Journal de voyage de Saint-Luc de La Corne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Le journal de voyage que Saint-Luc de La Corne écrivit en 1762 et fit publier à Montréal en 1778 constitue le premier jalon de l'histoire littéraire québécoise. Peu à peu oublié, le récit du naufrage de /'Auguste survécut dans la première moitié du xix3 siècle grâce à la tradition orale dont il fut l'objet dans la famille Aubert de Gaspê. À compter des années I860, la postérité se saisit du texte de La Corne. D'Aubert de Gaspépère à Robert de Roquebrune, en passant par Henri-Raymond Casgrain, Archibald MacMechan et Pierre-Georges Roy, les hommes de lettres apportent à l'épisode de /'Auguste des développements qui modifient jusqu'à l'esprit de l'oeuvre de La Corne. À mesure que ce jeu hypertextuel s'effectue, l'enjeu devient de plus en plus clairement idéologique dans la mesure où les littérateurs utiliseront l'effet La Corne pour alimenter leurs thèses respectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".