Steady-State Responses of Pulley-Belt Systems With a One-Way Clutch and Belt Bending Stiffness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A nonlinear hybrid discrete-continuous dynamic model is established to analyze the steady-state response of a pulley-belt system with a one-way clutch and belt bending stiffness. For the first time, the translating belt spans in pulley-belt systems coupled with one-way clutches are modeled as axially moving viscoelastic beams. Moreover, the model considers the rotations of the driving pulley, the driven pulley, and the accessory. The differential quadrature and integral quadrature methods are developed for space discretization of the nonlinear integropartial-differential equations in the dynamic model. Furthermore, the four-stage Runge–Kutta algorithm is employed for time discretization of the nonlinear piecewise ordinary differential equations. The time series are numerically calculated for the driven pulley, the accessory, and the translating belt spans. Based on the time series, the fast Fourier transform is used for obtaining the natural frequencies of the nonlinear vibration. The torque-transmitting directional behavior of the one-way clutch is revealed by the steady-state of the clutch torque in the primary resonances. The frequency-response curves of the translating belt, the driven pulley, and the accessory show that the one-way clutch reduces the resonance of the pulley-belt system. Furthermore, the belt cross section's aspect ratio significantly affects the dynamic response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it