The nature of the groundmass of surficial suevite from the Ries impact structure, Germany, and constraints on its origin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract— Surficial suevites from the Ries impact structure have been investigated in the field and using optical and analytical scanning electron microscopy. The groundmass of these suevites comprises calcite, clay minerals, impact melt glass, crystallites (plagioclase, garnet, and pyroxene), francolite, and Ba‐phillipsite. The latter zeolite is a secondary phase. Abundant textures have been observed: intricate flow textures between the various groundmass phases, globules of each phase in the other phases, spheroids of pyrrhotite in calcite, the “budding‐off” of clay globules into silicate glass and/or calcite, euhedral overgrowths of francolite on apatite clasts, and quench‐textured crystallites in the groundmass. Groundmass‐forming calcite displays higher FeO, MnO, and SiO2 contents than limestone target material. The composition of suevite “clay minerals” is highly variable and not always consistent with montmorillonite. Three types of glasses are distinguished in the groundmass. Type 1 glasses are SiO2‐rich and are clearly derived from sandstones in the sedimentary cover, while the protoliths of the other two glass types remains unclear. Analytical data and micro‐textures indicate that the calcite, silicate glass, francolite, and clay minerals of the groundmass of the Ries suevites represent a series of impact‐generated melts that were molten at the time of, and after, deposition. On cooling, plagioclase, pyroxene, and garnet crystallized from the groundmass. These results are at variance with the current, traditional descriptive definition of suevite. Given that Ries is the original type occurrence of “suevite,” some modification to the traditional definition may be in order. As the results of this study are most consistent with the groundmass of Ries surficial suevites representing a mix of several types of impact‐generated melts, we suggest that a possible origin for these suevites is as some form of impact melt flow(s) that emanated from different regions of the evolving crater.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".