MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003520994 · doi:10.1093/fs/lv.4.509

LE CAS DE MICHEL HOUELLEBECQ ET LA DYNAMIQUE DES GENRES LITTÉRAIRES

2001· article· fr· W2003520994 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article LE CAS DE MICHEL HOUELLEBECQ ET LA DYNAMIQUE DES GENRES LITTÉRAIRES Get access ROBERT DION, ROBERT DION UNIVERSIT É DU QUÉBEC À RIMOUSKI Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar HAGHEBAERT ÉLISABETH HAGHEBAERT ÉLISABETH UNIVERSIT É DU QUÉBEC À RIMOUSKI Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar French Studies, Volume LV, Issue 4, October 2001, Pages 509–524, https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/LV.4.509 Published: 01 October 2001

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it