Relationships between umbilical cord arterial blood pH levels at delivery and Bayley Psychomotor Development Index scores in early childhood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims : To correlate data on umbilical cord arterial blood pH (pHa) levels obtained at delivery with subsequent Bayley Psychomotor Development (PDI) scores determined on the same cohort of children at age 18 months. Methods : At delivery, we obtained umbilical cord bloods for pHa levels along with other biological parameters. Following the birth cohort prospectively, at age 18 months we did a comprehensive, blinded neurodevelopmental examination to determine a PDI score for each child. Results : Over the broad range of umbilical cord arterial blood pH levels from 7.03 to 7.52, no statistically significant correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient, −0.016, P=0.88) was found between pHa at delivery and PDI scores at age 18 months. To study our finding in greater detail, we formed a subset of the data consisting only of lower pHa levels at delivery (defined as ≤7.20) and subsequent PDI scores. In this data subset, we again found that no significant relationship existed (Pearson correlation coefficient, +0.003, P=0.99). Conclusions : Our findings are consistent with the evolving hypothesis that adverse neurological outcomes in children often have etiologies other than intrapartum fetal acidemia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".