MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003606969 · doi:10.1353/ces.2011.0043

Jeunes adultes immigrants de deuxième génération. Dynamiques ethnoreligieuses et identitaires

2011· article· fr· W2003606969 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Solange Lefebvre, Amina Triki-Yamani

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationSocializationHumanitiesSociologyContext (archaeology)Ethnic groupEthnologyAnthropologyGeographyPhilosophySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au Canada, l'arrivée d'immigrants appartenant à des religions autres que chrétiennes contribue à relancer la prise en compte de la variable religieuse pour comprendre la construction identitaire et l'intégration des jeunes. Cet article aborde quatre questions à partir de l'analyse qualitative d'entrevues qui se sont déroulées avec des groupes ou de manière individuelle auprès de jeunes adultes immigrants de deuxième génération, issus de familles chrétiennes, en contexte montréalais et québécois : la jeunesse et ses caractéristiques; l'immigration de deuxième génération et ses formes de socialisation; la religion, sous l'angle des pratiques, du rapport à l'ethnicité et au projet familial, et l'individualisation contemporaine, et enfin l'influence du contexte sur l'expérience individuelle.In Canada, the arrival of immigrants belonging to religions other than Christianity invites researchers to take into account the religious variable for understanding the construction of identity and integration among young adults. This paper addresses four issues through qualitative analysis of focus group and individual interviews of young adult second-generation immigrants, from Christian families in the Montreal and Quebec context: youth and its characteristics; immigration and second generation forms of socialization; religion, in terms of practices, relation to ethnicity and family project, and contemporary individualization, and, finally, the influence of the context on individual experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.261
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicMigration and Labor DynamicsFrench-language works237,207