Jeunes adultes immigrants de deuxième génération. Dynamiques ethnoreligieuses et identitaires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Canada, l'arrivée d'immigrants appartenant à des religions autres que chrétiennes contribue à relancer la prise en compte de la variable religieuse pour comprendre la construction identitaire et l'intégration des jeunes. Cet article aborde quatre questions à partir de l'analyse qualitative d'entrevues qui se sont déroulées avec des groupes ou de manière individuelle auprès de jeunes adultes immigrants de deuxième génération, issus de familles chrétiennes, en contexte montréalais et québécois : la jeunesse et ses caractéristiques; l'immigration de deuxième génération et ses formes de socialisation; la religion, sous l'angle des pratiques, du rapport à l'ethnicité et au projet familial, et l'individualisation contemporaine, et enfin l'influence du contexte sur l'expérience individuelle.In Canada, the arrival of immigrants belonging to religions other than Christianity invites researchers to take into account the religious variable for understanding the construction of identity and integration among young adults. This paper addresses four issues through qualitative analysis of focus group and individual interviews of young adult second-generation immigrants, from Christian families in the Montreal and Quebec context: youth and its characteristics; immigration and second generation forms of socialization; religion, in terms of practices, relation to ethnicity and family project, and contemporary individualization, and, finally, the influence of the context on individual experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".