MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003609718 · doi:10.1353/ncf.2011.0003

Marie ou l'esclavage aux États-Unis (review)

2011· article· fr· W2003609718 on OpenAlex
Aurelian Crăiuţu

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNineteenth-century French studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theory and Influence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemphisHumanitiesDemocracyArtHistoryPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Marie ou l'esclavage aux États-Unis Aurelian Craiutu Beaumont, Gustave de . Marie ou l'esclavage aux États-Unis, 2 vols, Marie-Claude Schapira, ed. Paris: L'Harmattan, 2009. ISBN 978-2-296-09506-9 (vol. 1); 978-2-296-09507-6 (vol. 2) Gustave de Beaumont (1802-1866) came to America in May 1831, accompanying Alexis de Tocqueville on their official mission as emissaries of the French government entrusted with the task of studying the penitentiary system in America. Disenchanted with the situation at home and dreaming of presenting their countrymen a model-mirror from which they could learn how to profit from democracy, the two young Frenchman went far beyond their official task and examined not only the prisons in America, but also the nature, mores, and institutions of the American democracy. As George W. Pierson described in his magisterial Tocqueville and Beaumont in America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1938), they travelled extensively (from New York, lower Canada, and the Ohio River Valley to Memphis, New Orleans, Washington, and Philadelphia), took detailed notes, and wrote back home to their families and friends about their impressions of America (Beaumont's letters were published in Lettres d'Amérique 1831-1832, Paris: PUF, 1973). After their nine-month sojourn, they returned to France and eventually completed the report on the penitentiary system (it was published in 1834). A year later, Tocqueville published volume one of De la démocratie en Amérique and Beaumont published a novel, Marie ou l'esclavage aux États-Unis. Both were instant successes and went through several subsequent printings for a while. Of the two books, Tocqueville's was more successful and became better known (he published a sequel in 1840). Marie had seven editions until 1842 after which it fell into oblivion, in spite of Beaumont's prominent political and intellectual position (he was a member of the [End Page 354] Chamber of Deputies and author of another important book on Ireland). The oblivion into which Marie fell is regrettable. Fortunately, Beaumont's novel is now available in a critical two-volume edition presented by Marie-Claude Schapira (volume one includes the novel, while the second contains Beaumont's notes and appendices). Eminently readable and extremely prescient, it is the chronicle of a tragic love story between a young Frenchman (Ludovic), who leaves France in search of exotic adventures, and a beautiful young white woman from Baltimore, who had one distant ancestor of black origin, and was therefore condemned to suffer from deep-seated racial prejudices even in a nominally free country. If the love story and its sad denouement occupy a good part of the book, Marie is much more than a mere novel. It is, in fact, an extended literary and political essay on America, a roman-mosaïque des idées, chock full of interesting reflections on American society, mores, and institutions, that nicely complement Tocqueville's musings on these topics. As such, Marie must be read and interpreted as the necessary accompaniment of Tocqueville's De la démocratie en Amérique, for in Beaumont's book the reader will find original reflections on the consequences of the equality of conditions, which is a key-concept for both authors (Schapira's edition also includes in the annex to the second volume three short fragments from Tocqueville's De la démocratie that point to the similarities with Beaumont's book). For Beaumont, perhaps more than for Tocqueville, America is a deeply paradoxical country insofar it uneasily combines liberty and equality with slavery and deep-seated racial prejudices. His thoughts on the troubled condition of the three races in America overlap with the ideas of Tocqueville from the last chapter of volume one of his masterpiece, although Beaumont went farther than him in predicting the civil war (vol. II, p. 64-79). Through the disenchanted voice of Ludovic, Beaumont comments on the tyranny of the majority in America, arguing that "in the United States, there are, for each act of tyranny, ten million tyrants" (vol. I, p. 86). For Ludovic, "public opinion is the most cruel of all tyrants" and "popular sovereignty is irresistible in its impulses" (vol. I...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.668
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it