Monitoring Clozapine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this pilot study was to determine whether fingerprick blood and plasma clozapine levels were equivalent to arm venipuncture blood and plasma levels for the purpose of therapeutic monitoring. A convenient sample of 10 outpatients from the Elgin Program of Assertive Community Treatment Team (PACT) participated in the study. Blood samples were obtained simultaneously from both the arm and finger in patients at steady state to measure clozapine levels. Each site provided a blood and plasma clozapine level, and they were compared. Clozapine levels from arm and finger sites were found to be equivalent in both blood and plasma. Although plasma clozapine levels were consistently greater than those in whole blood by a mean value of 27%, the plasma therapeutic threshold level (350-400 micro g/L) was considered an adequate target for monitoring. A fingerprick blood sample of 50 micro L was sufficient to measure clozapine levels accurately at steady state. We therefore concluded that fingerprick blood testing is as effective as the traditional arm venipuncture method in obtaining accurate clozapine levels. This procedure may provide certain benefits for the seriously mentally ill.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".