MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003668548 · doi:10.13031/aim.20131594309

Gaseous emissions from agricultural biomass combustion: a prediction model

2013· article· en· W2003668548 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Sébastien Fournel, Bernard Marcos, Stéphane Godbout, Michèle Heitz

Bibliographic record

Venue2013 Kansas City, Missouri, July 21 - July 24, 2013 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsCombustionWillowBiomass (ecology)Environmental scienceFossil fuelAgricultureCofiringBioenergyBiofuelWaste managementChemistryEngineeringAgronomyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. As the price of the fossil energy resources and the need to reduce the environmental impacts from energy use increase, biomass fuels have regained interest from Quebec’s agricultural sector. Producing and burning energy crops at the farm have become strategies to diversify incomes and decrease dependency to fossil fuels. However, the current absence of emission factors for solid fuel combustion does not allow a sustainable development for energy purposes. Besides, the variety of existing furnaces and biomasses complicates the establishment of such reference values. In order to quantify emissions (CO, CO2, NOx, SO2, CH4, NH3 and HCl) from on-farm combustion of different agricultural biomasses (short-rotation willow, switchgrass, reed canary grass, etc.), a prediction model was established based on the calculation of chemical equilibrium of reactive multicomponent systems. Under constant temperature and pressure, this technique has been judged as relevant for the prediction of product compositions considering inlet conditions in several operations and chemical processes, particularly gasification. The model was first established for wood gasification to be able to compare and validate its results with those of existing models from the literature using the same original data. The model was then adapted to biomass combustion and calibrated with recent results from combustion tests held in the province of Quebec. The preliminary results of the prediction model using data from past combustion experiments with wood, willow and switchgrass revealed good agreement between both measured and predicted values. Other simulation tests are required to increase accuracy of the model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2013 Kansas City, Missouri, July 21 - July 24, 2013Same topicThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesFrench-language works237,207