Pertinence des différentes modalités de présentation et comptabilisation des régimes d'options d'achat d'actions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Cette étude examine la pertinence de l’information relative aux options d’achat d’actions (OAA) attribuées aux dirigeants et publiée ou comptabilisée en vertu des différentes modalités ayant eu cours au Canada entre 2000 et 2005. Les résultats des analyses, menées sur un échantillon d’entreprises cotées à la Bourse de Toronto, tendent à démontrer que la publication d’éléments d’information dans l’annexe tout comme la constatation d’une charge relative aux OAA dans le compte de résultat semblent pertinentes pour les investisseurs. La publication dans l’annexe de la charge pour options par l’intermédiaire d’un bénéfice pro forma ne semble toutefois pas présenter un contenu informationnel significatif.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".