MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003693350 · doi:10.2118/129478-ms

Integrated Heavy Oil Production with HTL Field-Located Upgrading – Using Upgrading By-Products as a Fuel Source for EOR

2010· article· en· W2003693350 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joseph D. Kuhach, Edward koshka, Jim Pelham

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsIvanhoe Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleumWaste managementCapital costOil fieldEnvironmental scienceEnhanced oil recoveryNatural gasUpstream (networking)Production (economics)Process integrationProcess engineeringPetroleum engineeringEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ivanhoe Energy Inc.'s proprietary HTL upgrading technology is designed to cost effectively process heavy oil in the field and produce a stable upgraded synthetic oil that meets pipeline requirements. Upgrading by-products are converted on-site to steam for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). In developed markets, HTL improves the economics of heavy oil production by reducing or eliminating the need for natural gas and diluent, and by capturing the majority of the heavy to light oil price differential. In remote areas, where natural gas and diluent are not available, integrated HTL production frees otherwise stranded resources. HTL accomplishes all of this at a much smaller scale, at lower per barrel capital costs, and with less impact on the environment compared with conventional technologies. After years of piloting, development and commercial demonstration, HTL upgrading is in the process of commercial implementation. Integrated HTL/thermal EOR projects are progressing in Canada and Ecuador, illustrating applications in developed and undeveloped markets, respectively. This paper provides a description of the HTL upgrading process, with a particular focus on energy integration with upstream operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207