MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003725220 · doi:10.1049/ip-map:20045041

Microstrip fed single-layered substrate aperture coupled microstrip antenna

2005· article· en· W2003725220 on OpenAlexaff
Q. Rao, Tayeb A. Denidni, A. Sebak, R.H. Johnston

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Microwaves Antennas and Propagation · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryConcordia UniversityInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostrip antennaRadiation patternMicrostripMaterials sciencePatch antennaAntenna efficiencyAntenna (radio)OptoelectronicsOpticsAperture (computer memory)MicrowaveAntenna apertureSubstrate (aquarium)RadiationAcousticsPhysicsTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel aperture coupled microstrip antenna is proposed. This structure uses a single substrate for achieving a low profile, and good radiation efficiency and reduced back radiation. In the proposed design, a pair of radiating patches and a microstrip feed line are both etched on the top of a microwave substrate, and twin slots are etched on the bottom of this substrate. Simulated and measured radiation patterns indicate that the proposed structure can achieve a high radiation efficiency, 25 dB front to back radiation ratio, and 30 dB cross-polarisation field level below the corresponding co-polarisation field level. Such antenna architecture is important for mobile communication systems, where low profile, compact size and high radiation efficiency are required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEE Proceedings - Microwaves Antennas and PropagationSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207