MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Shooting Hoops at the Treatment Center: Sport Stories

2001· article· en· W2003747185 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuest · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Development and Social Support
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasketballNarrativeCenter (category theory)Perspective (graphical)Value (mathematics)Space (punctuation)PsychologyPhysical educationPedagogyPhysical spaceSociologyPersonal spaceWriting centerMathematics educationSocial psychologyVisual artsHistoryArtLiteratureComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following series of shon stories has been reconstructed, in part, from the data collected during an interpretive case study of an active living program at an adolescent treatment center/school (Halas, 1999). Using excerpts from interview transscripts, fi eldwork observations, reflective journal writing, and personal memories (from the author's past experiences as a teacher at the school). this fictional narrative describes how a day at a treatment center/school unfolds. not just on the basketball court, but also in terms of interconnected life issues. The configuration of stories to follow attempts to demonstrate how physical education can provide a space during the school day for change to occur, thus providing an alternative perspective from which to view the value of the physical activity experience, particularly for troubled youth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it