Cytogenetic analysis of Q-banded pronuclear chromosomes in fertilized Syrian hamster eggs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The frequency and type of chromosome abnormalities were analyzed in 917 female pronuclei in Syrian hamster eggs fertilized by human sperm. Analysis at this stage allows detection of errors which have occurred during meiosis I and II. The chromosomes were Q-banded to identify individual chromosomes and detect subtle alterations. Thirty-three (3.6%) of the hamster egg complements were abnormal: 19 (2.1%) were hypohaploid, seven (0.76%) were hyperhaploid, two (0.2%) had double aneuploidy, and five (0.5%) had a structural chromosome abnormality. Since there were significantly more hypohaploid than hyperhaploid complements, a conservative estimate of aneuploidy can be derived by doubling the frequency of hyperhaploid complements. Thus a minimal estimate of aneuploidy (single, 1.5%, and double, 0.2%) is 1.7% and a minimal estimate of the total frequency of abnormalities is 2.2%. All chromosome groups were represented among the aneuploid complements suggesting that all chromosomes are susceptible to non-disjunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".