Peripheral nerve and neuromuscular allotransplantation: Current status
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some major peripheral nerve deficits in otherwise salvageable extremities are unreconstructable with autogenous nerve grafts because of their limited availability. Peripheral nerve allotransplantation has been attempted experimentally and clinically for more than a century. It is only since the advent of the immunophyllin-immunosuppressive agents (Cyclosporin A and FK506) that nerve regeneration across allografts has been comparable to that observed across autografts. Experimental studies have demonstrated excellent regeneration through nerve allografts with recipient CsA and FK506 immunosuppression given continuously and for limited periods. This permitted the development of a clinical trial. To date, seven patients received major nerve reconstructions with nerve allografts under temporary immunosuppression; six have had sensory recovery; three motor recovery; and one no recovery due to rejection. The experimental and clinical work will be reviewed and relevance to composite tissue allotransplantation discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it