MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2003764650 · doi:10.1139/w04-086

Nature of the genome of the saprophytic spirochete <i>Spirochaeta aurantia</i> and its ribosomal RNA operons

2004· article· en· W2003764650 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Richard William McLaughlin, David Secko, Catherine J. Paul, Andrew M. Kropinski

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfer RNARibosomal RNABiology23S ribosomal RNAGeneticsGeneIntergenic regionOperonGenomeTreponema denticolaMolecular biologyRestriction enzymeRibosomal Intergenic Spacer analysisRNAMicrobiologyInternal transcribed spacerEscherichia coliBacteriaRibosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using restriction endonucleases DraI, AseI, and I-CeuI in conjunction with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, we have shown that Spirochaeta aurantia M1 possesses a circular 3.98-Mb genome. This is the second largest spirochete chromosome yet analyzed. The observation that the latter enzyme cuts in 3 places suggests the presence of 3 copies of the large subunit (23S) rRNA gene (rrl), which was confirmed by Southern hybridizations. The complete sequence of 2 of the ribosomal RNA operons was determined, revealing that their structure resembled that of the typical member of the bacterial superkingdom: rrs (16S; 1561 bp), tRNA, rrl (23S; 2972 bp), and rrf (5S; 110 bp). The S. aurantia rrs-rrl intergenic regions, as with Treponema denticola, contain genes specifying a 73-nt tRNA(Ala) (anticodon TGC) and a 77-nt tRNA(Ile) (anticodon GAT).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Microbiology→Same topicMycobacterium research and diagnosis→French-language works237,207→