MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003791624 · doi:10.12968/bjtr.2002.9.5.13630

Self-directed learning in fieldwork education with learning contracts

2002· article· en· W2003791624 on OpenAlexaff
Hector W. H. Tsang, Margo Paterson, Tanya Packer

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReflective Practices in Education
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutodidacticismRelevance (law)Context (archaeology)Experiential learningPsychologyPedagogyMedical educationMedicinePolitical scienceHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the relevance of self-directed learning in fieldwork education in Hong Kong. A workshop for fieldwork educators aimed at facilitating self-directed learning of occupational therapy students through the use of learning contracts is reported. The pros and cons of using self-directed learning in Hong Kong are discussed in the light of the cultural context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of Therapy and RehabilitationSame topicReflective Practices in EducationFrench-language works237,207