MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003794295 · doi:10.5539/ijel.v2n2p132

Reflection on Teaching Reform of the Course of “College English” under Professional Teaching Reform Model Based on Working Process

2012· article· en· W2003794295 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dingmin Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of English Linguistics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHigher Education and Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCourse (navigation)Process (computing)Reflection (computer programming)Vocational educationMathematics educationAutomationCollege EnglishComputer scienceEngineering managementSociologyPsychologyPedagogyEngineeringMechanical engineeringProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through reflection on the course reform of “College English” under the professional teaching reform model based on working process in the Electrical Automation Technology Major in Department of Automatic Control in Yibin Vocational and Technical College, this paper discuses problems existing in realistic teaching model in the course of “College English”, talks about how to take the orientation of working process in combination of reality of teaching to seek to break through the tradition of establishing the discipline system, conduct course reform and propose specific measures and suggestions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of English LinguisticsSame topicHigher Education and Teaching MethodsFrench-language works237,207