MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003794906 · doi:10.1021/la020129h

Highly Parallel, Nanoscale Stripe Morphology in Mixed Phospholipid Monolayers Formed by Langmuir−Blodgett Transfer

2002· article· en· W2003794906 on OpenAlexaff
Patricia Moraille, Antonella Badia

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLangmuir–Blodgett filmMonolayerMicaNanoscopic scaleMaterials scienceSubstrate (aquarium)Surface forces apparatusMorphology (biology)Phase (matter)NanometreChemical engineeringChemical physicsNanotechnologyCrystallographyChemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been used to investigate the morphology of mixed monolayers of 1,2-dilauroyl- sn -glycero-3-phosphocholine (DLPC) and 1,2-dipalmitoyl- sn -glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) deposited onto mica by the Langmuir−Blodgett technique. At compositions near the critical point where phase separation is first observed by AFM, this binary lipid mixture yields a regular nanometer-scale pattern of highly parallel stripes. The area fraction covered by the stripes in the AFM images, their height, and mechanical properties are consistent with phase separation into solidlike DPPC stripe domains and a liquidlike DLPC matrix. The orientation of the stripes has been found to always be perpendicular to the film transfer direction, even when the substrate orientation is varied. This indicates that the film deposition process plays an important role in the generation of the stripe pattern. AFM images of films deposited onto mica at different surface pressures and substrate pulling speeds provide physical insight into the process of stripe formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLangmuirSame topicLipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207