MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003833411 · doi:10.1109/whispers.2011.6080877

MR-i — overview and first results of the ABB high speed hyperspectral imaging spectroradiometer

2011· article· en· W2003833411 on OpenAlexaff
Florent Prel, Louis Moreau, Stéphane Lantagne, Christian Vallières, Claude Roy, Luc Lévesque

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsABB (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingSpectroradiometerModular designProduct lineFull spectral imagingSpectral imagingImage resolutionComputer scienceChemical imagingRemote sensingImaging spectroscopySpectral resolutionSpectral signatureModerate-resolution imaging spectroradiometerArtificial intelligenceComputer visionOpticsPhysicsEngineeringGeologySpectral lineReflectivitySatellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With more than 35 years of innovation in spectroscopy, ABB presents its most recent addition to the proven MR product line. This instrument, called MR-i, is a fast imaging Fourier Transform spectroradiometer. It generates spectral data cubes in the MWIR and LWIR and is designed to acquire the spectral signature of various scenes with high temporal, spatial and spectral resolution. MR-i features the MR series 4 ports FTIR architecture enhanced for imaging spectroradiometry. Its architecture is modular and can be configured to support several applications and measurement scenarios for improved performances and extended hyperspectral imaging capabilities. An overview of the new MR-i design and capabilities will be presented as well as the current product development status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207