Blue Luminescent Rigid Molecular Rods Bearing <i>N</i>-7-Azaindolyl and 2,2‘-Dipyridylamino and Their Zn(II) and Ag(I) Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate the luminescent and thermal properties of organic compounds with rigid entities, a series of new blue/purple luminescent bridging ligands, 4,4'-(N-7-azaindolyl)diphenylacetylene (5), 4-(N-7-azaindolyl)-4'-(2,2'-dipyridylamino)diphenylacetylene (6), 4,4'-(2,2'-dipyridylamino)diphenylacetylene (7), and 4,4'-(dipyridylamino)diphenylbutadiyne (8) have been synthesized through Pd-mediated Sonogashira coupling. The structures of compounds 6 and 8 were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. Compounds 5-8 are luminescent in solution at room temperature, with emission lambda(max) = 361, 382, 386, and 405 nm, respectively. At 77 K, compounds 5-8 exhibit both fluorescent and phosphorescent emission. The 2,2'-dipyridylamino symmetrically substituted ligand 7 forms a linear dinuclear complex 9 with zinc(II) ions, in which the two pyridyl rings of the dipyridylamino portion are chelated to the metal center. However, with Ag(I) ions, ligand 7 forms a dinuclear complex (10), which displays a macrocyclic structure with only one of the two pyridyl rings from each dipyridylamino portion being coordinated to the silver atom. Both 9 and 10 exhibit luminescence in the near-UV region in CH(2)Cl(2) at room temperature with lambda(max) = 385 and 384 nm, respectively. The fluorescence of 7 can be partially quenched by either Zn(2+) or H(+). The behavior of ligands 8 toward Ag(I) and Zn(II) ions is similar to that of 7.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".