Temporal Changes in Insulin Sensitivity Following the Development of Acute Liver Failure Secondary to Acetaminophen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Insulin resistance in chronic liver disease (CLD) is well documented. This study investigated whether similar changes occur in acute liver failure (ALF). Patients with ALF (n = 10) were recruited within 72 hours of their peak prothrombin time (range 42-120 seconds). All patients were ventilated for encephalopathy (grade III-IV). Peripheral and endogenous insulin sensitivity were assessed by a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (Human Actrapid 1.5 mU/min/kg) with an infusion of D-[6,6-(2)H(2)] glucose. The clamp was performed on day 0 and then on day 7 and day 14. During the insulin infusion, the mean total peripheral glucose uptake (area under the curve [AUC]) was 1,422 (SD, 1,253), 2,244 (SD, 1,392), and 4,500 (SD, 1,120) micromol/kg on days 0, 7, and 14, respectively. Significant changes occurred from day 0 to 14 (day 14-day 0: 3,078 [95% CI, 1,798 to 4,359]; P =.001) and day 7 to 14 (day 14-day 7: 2,256 [95% CI, 923 to 3,589]; P =.001). No significant difference in endogenous glucose production was demonstrated over time. Mean peripheral insulin sensitivity altered over time, increasing from 0.09 (SD, 0.09) micromol/kg/min/mU/L on day 0 to 0.24 (SD, 0.16) on day 7 and 0.5 (SD, 0.1) on day 14. Significant changes occurred between days 0, 7, and 14 (day 7-day 0: 0.15 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.26], P =.006; day 14-day 0: 0.4 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.5], P =.001; day 14-day 7: 0.2 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.38], P =.001). This study demonstrates that in ALF, impaired peripheral uptake of glucose occurs, peripheral insulin sensitivity being restored at 2 weeks in subjects who survived.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".