MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003877802 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.31269

Hydrocephaly, penoscrotal transposition, and digital anomalies associated with de novo pseudodicentric rearranged chromosome 13 characterized by classical cytogenetic methods and mBAND analysis

2006· article· en· W2003877802 on OpenAlexaff
Denise Maria Christofolini, Maisa Yoshimoto, Jeremy A. Squire, Décio Brunoni, Maria Isabel Melaragno, Gianna Carvalheira

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMonosomyDicentric chromosomeKaryotypeGeneticsBiologyChromatidSister chromatidsCytogeneticsTransposition (logic)ChromosomeGeneMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on a patient with hydrocephaly, penoscrotal transposition, oligodactyly, and minor anomalies. Comprehensive cytogenetic studies involving both classical cytogenetic methods and mBAND analysis were used to show a stable dicentric rearranged chromosome 13 that result in a 46,XY,psu dic(13;13)(13pter --> 13q32::13q11 --> 13pter) de novo karyotype. This aberration probably arose as a consequence of unequal sister chromatid breakage repair events. This report is the first to describe all of the most severe features associated with partial monosomy in one patient. Moreover, the delineation of monosomy 13q32 --> qter in this patient facilitates identification of the developmental genes responsible for the clinical features within this region of chromosome 13.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.221
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207