Bibliographic record
Abstract
La mémoire dans la dramaturgie grecque moderne ne constitue pas un acte statique de rappel mais un acte complexe et évolutif de reconstitution du passé sous l’influence du présent et du milieu social. De la fin de la junte et après (1974), ces versions de la mémoire dramatique ramènent les sujets à certaines situations du passé qui peuvent révéler les causes d’une vie ratée, décentraliser les certitudes fortes d’une conscience rationnelle, déconstruire, en bref, la présence et l’identité dans les ombres de l’absence et de l’altérité. De ces versions perce une force négative de la mémoire qui bloque les déroulements et bouleverse la cohérence. Néanmoins d’autre part, il y a sa force positive qui tend à reconstituer les morceaux, à offrir une perspective temporelle pour base et un horizon temporel comme direction à la conscience éthique du présent, à créer un vécu de l’« appartenance au monde et à son histoire ». La mémoire, comme on le voit dans l’image de la dramaturgie grecque contemporaine, semble émerger de la trame dialectique de ces deux forces. Des forces négatives et positives de la mémoire théâtrale convergent en exemples locaux qui s’éloignent des références prédéterminées et introduisent parfois de nouvelles optiques dans les théories officielles du passé et dans leurs interprétations unidimensionnelles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Not applicable | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Theoretical or conceptual | low |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".