MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003892757 · doi:10.1587/elex.9.895

The evaluation of the magnetic field below 30MHz in an open area test site

2012· article· en· W2003892757 on OpenAlexaff
Kazuo Ishizuka, Masamitsu Tokuda, Tanakajima Katsuyuki, Masaru Yoshihara, Sumio Kaifuchi, Yoshinobu Okano

Bibliographic record

VenueIEICE Electronics Express · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsIntertek (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Magnetic fieldEngineeringMoment (physics)Field (mathematics)PhysicsComputer scienceMathematicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photovoltaic generation systems and power line communication systems radiate EM-waves below 30MHz. In this situation, measurement sites for the EM-waves are required. However, evaluation methods of the site below 30MHz are not established yet. In this paper, we measure the magnetic behavior below 30MHz in a OATS (Open Area Test Site), and also simulate with a moment method. As the results, the deviation between the measurement and calculation data became within 2.5dB. Therefore, we confirm that this paper’s method of measurement can be used to evaluate the measurement site in below 30MHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.230

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEICE Electronics ExpressSame topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207