MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GRID macroscopic growth law and its application to image inference

2011· article· en· W2003899288 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly of Applied Mathematics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiffeomorphismGridMathematicsIterated functionApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationInferenceOptimal controlFunction (biology)Mathematical analysisComputer scienceGeometryArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In computational anatomy large deformations of anatomical structures observed in images are represented by diffeomorphic flows on the background space of coordinates. They are usually <italic>maximum a posteriori</italic> (MAP) estimates obtained by minimization of the cost function (posterior energy) consistent with the material properties of an organism. This paper constructs the underlying transformations induced by biological growth according to the Growth as Random Iterated Diffeomorphisms (GRID) model proposed by U. Grenander. They are diffeomorphic flows generated by the GRID macroscopic growth integro-differential equation that emphasizes dependency of the flow on such GRID variables as the Poisson intensity of cell decisions and relative rate of expansion/contraction. We explore some cost function models that yield biologically meaningful estimates of these growth parameters. Namely, we seek a prior energy that measures cell activities represented by the Poisson intensity function. Using the macroscopic growth law we formulate an optimal control problem where the GRID variables are optimal controls that force an image of the initial organism to be continuously transformed into an image of the grown organism. We apply the Polak-Ribière conjugate gradient algorithm for direct estimation of the growth parameters from given images. Then the biological mapping is automatically obtained from estimated growth parameters. The accuracy of GRID variable and image estimates obtained by the inference algorithm depends on the value of the weighting coefficient of the prior energy. We propose an experimental evaluation of this coefficient and reveal growth patterns expressed in GRID variables hidden in confocal micrographs of Wingless gene expression patterns in the larval Drosophila wing disc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it