MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003909051 · doi:10.1109/tap.2012.2207696

Scattering From Cylinders Near a Dielectric Half-Space Using a General Method of Images

2012· article· en· W2003909051 on OpenAlex
Peter Pawliuk, Matthew J. Yedlin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsScatteringPlanarPlane waveFourier seriesOpticsIntegral equationFourier transformPhysicsPlane (geometry)Reflection (computer programming)Mathematical analysisNear and far fieldDielectricBoundary (topology)Boundary value problemGeometryMathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The two-dimensional scattering of an arbitrary beam of radiation from multiple dielectric cylinders near a dielectric half-space is considered using a general method of images (GMI). The electromagnetic fields are broken down into cylindrical waves so that the boundary conditions for the cylinders can be applied directly. Two approaches for calculating the multiple scattering between the cylinders and the planar interface are compared: the plane-wave integral method and the Fourier series method. The plane-wave integral method involves numerically integrating a plane-wave spectrum for the reflection from the planar interface. The Fourier series method avoids numerical integration but poses problems for evanescent fields. By introducing evanescent field correction terms we are able to show the equivalence of the two methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it