MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003910800 · doi:10.1115/1.4002978

Turning Black-Box Functions Into White Functions

2011· article· en· W2003910800 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanical Design · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBlack boxMetamodelingWhite boxVariable (mathematics)Process (computing)Radial basis functionRepresentation (politics)Computer scienceFunction (biology)AlgorithmMathematical optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMachine learningArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recently developed metamodel, radial basis function-based high-dimensional model representation (RBF-HDMR), shows promise as a metamodel for high-dimensional expensive black-box functions. This work extends the modeling capability of RBF-HDMR from the current second-order form to any higher order. More importantly, the modeling process “uncovers” black-box functions so that not only is a more accurate metamodel obtained, but also key information about the function can be gained and thus the black-box function can be turned “white.” The key information that can be gained includes: (1) functional form, (2) (non)linearity with respect to each variable, and (3) variable correlations. The black-box “uncovering” process is based on identifying the existence of certain variable correlations through two derived theorems. The adaptive process of exploration and modeling reveals the black-box functions until all significant variable correlations are found. The black-box functional form is then represented by a structure matrix that can manifest all orders of correlated behavior of the variables. The resultant metamodel and its revealed inner structure lend themselves well to applications such as sensitivity analysis, decomposition, visualization, and optimization. The proposed approach is tested with theoretical and practical examples. The test results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it