MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2003922624 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2014.6901145

City traffic management model using Wireless Sensor Networks

2014· article· en· W2003922624 on OpenAlexaff
Mustazibur Rahman, N. U. Ahmed, Hussein T. Mouftah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTraffic congestionNetwork traffic controlFloating car dataTraffic congestion reconstruction with Kerner's three-phase theoryVehicle Information and Communication SystemComputer networkWireless sensor networkTransport engineeringNetwork congestionScheme (mathematics)Road trafficEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Road network of a region is an important mean of overall development. To manage the traffic in a city environment is a key factor for the city authority. In this perspective, reducing the road traffic congestion is a significant challenge. In this paper, a dynamic mathematical model for managing road traffic in important intersections of a city by reducing congestion is presented. This system will be built based on wireless sensor network which will detect the congestion on the road and broadcast the congestion information to the drivers in order to detour for avoiding congestion. Matlab simulation of this proposed model was performed with traffic generated following Poisson Distribution for twelve selected important intersections of a city and cost function was estimated for the generated traffic. Simulation results show that this traffic scheme succeeds in reducing the congestion compared to the traffic situation without this scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207