A THREE‐STAGE ALGORITHM FOR FILTERING ERRONEOUS ARGOS SATELLITE LOCATIONS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Several methods have been used to identify erroneous animal locations based on Argos satellite data. Using 15,987 satellite locations for 37 gray seals (Haliockoerus grypus), we tested a three‐stage filtering algorithm designed to address shortcomings of other filters. In stage 1, for each location, four rates of travel were calculated—the rate to each of the two previous locations and the two subsequent locations. If all four rates exceeded 2 m/sec (95th percentile of our data), the location was removed (7.25% of total locations). Stage 2 incorporated the filtering algorithm developed by McConnell et al. (1992) resulting in the rejection of 22.75% of total locations based on reasonable assumptions of straight‐line travel. At stage 3, the remaining data were evaluated against a distance threshold, defined as the 99th percentile of realized distance traveled over a period of seven days. Locations exceeding this threshold‐were rejected (0.69% of total locations). Overall, the three‐stage filter eliminated fewer locations (30.7 ± 1.62%), than the stage 2 filter alone. Most standard locations were retained, but 85.7% of location class 0, 76.6% of A, and 41.9% of B were also retained. These location classes account for most of data routinely collected but not used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".